Experiences of nurses caring for respiratory patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey study.

BACKGROUND: Nurses have been at the forefront of the pandemic response, involved in extensive coordination of services, screening, vaccination and front-line work in respiratory, emergency and intensive care environments. The nature of this work is often intense and stress-provoking with an inevitable psychological impact on nurses and all healthcare workers. This study focused on nurses working in respiratory areas with the aim of identifying and characterising the self-reported issues that exacerbated or alleviated their concerns during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An online survey was developed consisting of 90 questions using a mixture of open-ended and closed questions. Participant demographic data were also collected (age, gender, ethnicity, number of years qualified, details of long-term health conditions, geographical location, nursing background/role and home life). The online survey was disseminated via social media and professional respiratory societies (British Thoracic Society, Primary Care Respiratory Society, Association of Respiratory Nurse Specialists) over a 3-week period in May 2020 and the survey closed on 1 June 2020. RESULTS: The study highlights the experiences of nurses caring for respiratory patients during the first wave of the pandemic in early 2020. Concerns were expressed over the working environment, the supply and availability of adequate protective personal equipment, the quality of care individuals were able to deliver, and the impact on mental health to nurses and their families. A high number provided free-text comments around their worries and concerns about the impact on their household; these included bringing the virus home, the effect on family members worrying about them, mental health and the impact of changing working patterns, and managing with children. Although both formal and informal support were available, there were inconsistencies in provision, highlighting the importance of nursing leadership and management in ensuring equity of access to services. CONCLUSIONS: Support for staff is essential both throughout the pandemic and afterwards, and it is important that preparation of individuals regarding building resilience is recognised. It is also clear that psychological support and services for nurses and the wider healthcare team need to be available and quickly convened in the event of similar major incidents, either global or local.

Role of Intermediate Care Unit Admission and Noninvasive Respiratory Support during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to shortage of intensive care unit (ICU) capacity. We developed a triage strategy including noninvasive respiratory support and admission to the intermediate care unit (IMCU). ICU admission was restricted to patients requiring invasive ventilation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to the IMCU. METHOD: Retrospective cohort including consecutive patients admitted between March 28 and April 27, 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure avoiding ICU admission. Secondary outcomes included the rate of emergency intubation, 28-day mortality, and predictors of ICU admission. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia were admitted to the IMCU. Among the 85 patients admitted for worsening respiratory failure, 52/85 (61%) avoided ICU admission. In multivariate analysis, PaO2/FiO2 (OR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99) and BMI (OR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98) were significantly associated with ICU admission. No death or emergency intubation occurred in the IMCU. CONCLUSIONS: IMCU admission including standardized triage criteria, self-proning, and noninvasive respiratory support prevents ICU admission for a large proportion of patients with COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, IMCUs may play an important role in preserving ICU capacity by avoiding ICU admission for patients with worsening respiratory failure and allowing early discharge of ICU patients.

Experiencia de una Unidad de Ventilación Mecánica Pediátrica Prolongada en un hospital público de Chile / Experience in a Pediatric Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Unit from a public hospital in Chile

Introducción: Los pacientes hospitalizados con altas dependencias tecnológicas respiratorias son cada vez más frecuentes y generan largas estadías en unidades de cuidados intensivos. Las estrategias que mitiguen su impacto han sido escasamente descritas. Objetivo: Describir 6 años de experiencia de una Unidad de Ventilación Mecánica Prolongada Pediátrica.Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo. Se incluyeron todos los niños ingresados a la Unidad entre 10-2012 y 12-2018. Se realizó estadística descriptiva e inferencial, analizando tiempos de hospitalización y reingresos. Se compararon distintas variables según tipo de patología y ventilación mecánica.Resultados: 113 pacientes registraron 310 ingresos a la Unidad. Edad de ingreso: 2,2 años (0,6-8,8); varones: el 60,2 %. Patologías: enfermedad neuromuscular (el 22,1 %), enfermedad pulmonar crónica (el 20,4 %), daño neurológico (el 34,5 %), obstrucción de vía aérea superior (el 9,7 %), cardiopatía (el 3,5 %), síndrome de Down (el 9,7 %). Se utilizaron 10 507 días/cama; con índice ocupacional del 92,6 %, el 54,8 % de traslados a la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos y el 66,1 % de reingresos. Hospitalización media: 16 días (6,5-49,0); diferencias en edad de ingreso según patologías (p = 0,032). Hubo más reingresos en niños con daño neurológico y síndrome de Down (p = 0,004). Los niños con asistencia ventilatoria invasiva presentaron más días de hospitalización (p < 0,001) y reingresos (p < 0,001).Conclusión: El índice ocupacional fue superior al 90 %; permitió mayor disponibilidad de camas intensivas y egresar a todos los pacientes. Los niños con asistencia ventilatoria invasiva se hospitalizaron más tiempo y reingresaron más

Introduction: Hospitalized patients with high respiratory technology dependency are increasingly common and result in lengthy stays in intensive care units. Strategies mitigating its impact have been scarcely described.Objective: To describe a 6-year experience in a Pediatric Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Unit.Methods: Retrospective study. All children admitted to the unit between October 2012 and December 2018 were included. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used, analyzing lengths of stay and readmissions. Different outcome measures were compared according to the type of pathology and mechanical ventilation.Results: A total of 113 patients had 310 admissions to the unit. Age at admission: 2.2 years (0.6-8.8); males: 60.2 %. Pathologies: neuromuscular disease (22.1 %), chronic lung disease (20.4 %), neurological damage (34.5 %), upper airway obstruction (9.7 %), heart disease (3.5 %), Down syndrome (9.7 %). A total of 10 507 bed-days were used; with a 92.6 % occupancy rate, 54.8 % of transfers to the intensive care unit, and 66.1 % of readmissions. Mean length of stay: 16 days (6.5-49.0); differences in age at admission observed by pathology (p = 0.032). More readmissions were observed in children with neurological damage and Down syndrome (p = 0.004). Children with invasive ventilation were observed to have a longer length of stay (p < 0.001) and more readmissions (p < 0.001).Conclusion: The occupancy rate at the PMVU was over 90 %, which allowed more available intensive care beds and discharging all patients. Children with invasive ventilation had a longer length of stay and more readmissions.

Geographic Inequalities of Respiratory Health Services Utilization during Childhood in Edmonton and Calgary, Canada: A Tale of Two Cities.

Young children are susceptible to respiratory diseases. Inequalities exist across socioeconomic groups for paediatric respiratory health services utilization in Alberta. However, the geographic distribution of those inequalities has not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to identify geographic inequalities in respiratory health services utilization in early childhood in Calgary and Edmonton, two major urban centres in Western Canada. We conducted a geographic analysis of data from a retrospective cohort of all singleton live births occurred between 2005 and 2010. We aggregated at area-level the total number of episodes of respiratory care (hospitalizations and emergency department visits) that occurred during the first five years of life for bronchiolitis, pneumonia, lower/upper respiratory tract infections, influenza, and asthma-wheezing. We used spatial filters to identify geographic inequalities in the prevalence of acute paediatric respiratory health services utilization in Calgary and Edmonton. The average health gap between areas with the highest and the lowest prevalence of respiratory health services utilization was 1.5-fold in Calgary and 1.4-fold in Edmonton. Geographic inequalities were not completely explained by the spatial distribution of socioeconomic status, suggesting that other unmeasured factors at the neighbourhood level may explain local variability in the use of acute respiratory health services in early childhood.

Prevalence and development of chronic critical illness in acute patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care setting.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic Critical Illness (chronic CI) is a condition associated to patients surviving an episode of acute respiratory failure (ARF). The prevalence and the factors associated with the development of chronic CI in the population admitted to a Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU) have not yet been clarified. METHODS: An observational prospective cohort study was undertaken at the RICU of the University Hospital of Modena (Italy). Patients mechanically ventilated with ARF in RICU were enrolled. Demographics, severity scores (APACHEII, SOFA, SAPSII), and clinical condition (septic shock, pneumonia, ARDS) were recorded on admission. Respiratory mechanics and inflammatory-metabolic blood parameters were measured both on admission and over the first week of stay. All variables were tested as predictors of chronic CI through univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Chronic CI occurred in 33 out of 100 patients observed. Higher APACHEII, the presence of septic shock, diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) at sonography, multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infection, the occurrence of a second infection during stay, and a C-reactive protein (CRP) serum level inceasing 7 days over admission were associated with chronic CI. Septic shock was the strongest predictor of chronic CI (AUC = 0.92 p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic CI is frequent in patients admitted to RICU and mechanically ventilated due to ARF. Infection-related factors seem to play a major role as predictors of this syndrome.

Impact of strategic planning, organizational culture imprint and care bundles to reduce adverse events in the ICU.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of adverse events during a multifaceted program implementation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional secondary analysis. SETTING: The respiratory-ICU of a large tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Retrospectively collected data of patients admitted from 1 March 2010 to 28 February 2014 (usual care period) and from 1 March 2014 to 1 March 2017 (multifaceted program period) were used. INTERVENTIONS: The program integrated three components: (1) strategic planning and organizational culture imprint; (2) training and practice and (3) implementation of care bundles. Strategic planning redefined the respiratory-ICU Mission and Vision, its SWOT matrix (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) as well as its medium to long-term aims and planned actions. A 'Wear the Institution's T-shirt' monthly conference was given in order to foster organizational culture in healthcare personnel. Training was conducted on hand hygiene and projects 'Pneumonia Zero' and 'Bacteremia Zero'. Finally, actions of both projects were implemented. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of adverse events (episodes per 1000 patient/days). RESULTS: Out of 1662 patients (usual care, n = 981; multifaceted program, n = 681) there was a statistically significant reduction during the multifaceted program in episodes of accidental extubation ([Rate ratio, 95% CI] 0.31, 0.17-0.55), pneumothorax (0.48, 0.26-0.87), change of endotracheal tube (0.17, 0.07-0.44), atelectasis (0.37, 0.20-0.68) and death in the ICU (0.82, 0.69-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted program including strategic planning, organizational culture imprint and care protocols was associated with a significant reduction of adverse events in the respiratory-ICU.

The limited impact of psychiatric disease and psychotropic medication on the outcome of hospitalization for pneumonia.

Psychotropic medicine has been suggested to be a risk factor for the onset of pneumonia, especially aspiration pneumonia. However, the impact of coexisting psychiatric disease and psychotropic medication on the outcomes of pneumonia patients in the respiratory care unit setting is less well-known. We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of 209 consecutive patients who were hospitalized due to pneumonia. Using the patients' records, coexisting psychiatric diseases and the use of psychotropic medicines were reviewed to examine their association with the clinical course of inpatients with pneumonia. Psychotropic medicines, including agents for insomnia, were used in 73 (34.9%) patients, and there were 35 (16.9%) patients who had psychiatric disease. Among the 12 (5.7%) fatal cases, 4 patients were treated with psychotropic medicines, all of which were agents for insomnia. However, the rate of psychotropic medicine usage in the fatal cases (33.3%) was equivalent to that of the survivors (35%, p = 0.905), and the coexistence of psychiatric disease did not affect survival. The median duration of hospitalization was 15 days. The duration of hospitalization of the patients who received psychotropic medicines (median: 17 [range: 7-89] days) was also equivalent to that of the other patients (14 [2-55] days, p = 0.081). While the present study was a single-centre study and had a small population, coexisting psychiatric disease and psychotropic medicine use did not have a strong impact on the outcomes of pneumonia patients who were hospitalized in the respiratory unit of a university hospital. Further prospective studies targeting a larger cohort are needed.

Management appropriateness and outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

The impact of adherence to published guidelines on the outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has not been well defined by previous studies.In this prospective cohort study of patients admitted to a respiratory department (n=2096), we evaluated whether patients with PE had better outcomes if they were acutely managed according to international guidelines. Outcomes consisted of all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding events during the first month of follow-up after diagnosis.Overall, 408 patients (19% (95% CI 18-21%)) did not receive guideline-adherent PE management. Patients receiving non-adherent management were significantly more likely to experience all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.39 (95% CI 1.57-3.61) or PE-related mortality (adjusted OR 5.02 (95% CI 2.42-10.42); p<0.001) during follow-up. Non-adherent management was also a significant independent predictor of recurrent VTE (OR 2.19 (95% CI 1.11-4.32); p=0.03) and major bleeding (OR 2.65 (95% CI 1.66-4.24); p<0.001). An external validation cohort of 34 380 patients with PE from the RIETE registry confirmed these findings.PE management that does not adhere to guidelines for indications related to anticoagulation, thrombolytics and inferior vena cava filters is associated with worse patient outcomes.

Situación actual de la rehabilitación respiratoria en los hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid / No disponible

Introducción: A pesar de que la rehabilitación respiratoria (RR) es considerada como una intervención terapéutica con alto nivel de evidencia científica, la estructura y la organización de las unidades de RR pueden repercutir en sus resultados. Nuestra intención era conocer la situación actual de las unidades de RR de la Comunidad de Madrid. Material y métodos: Análisis de los resultados de la encuesta distribuida a todos los hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid mediante correo electrónico desde la Sociedad Madrileña de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (NEUMOMADRID) y la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación Cardiorrespiratoria (SORECAR). La encuesta fue diseñada de acuerdo a los estándares de calidad asistencial en RR propuestos por la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR). Resultados: Once (61,6%) hospitales señalaron que contaban con una unidad de RR y en el 54,5% de ellas no existía acceso desde atención primaria. El 72,7% de unidades indicó que la derivación de pacientes no era adecuada. Casi todas las unidades ofrecían programas de fisioterapia, entrenamiento aeróbico, de fuerza muscular y soporte educativo, sin embargo solo el 27,3% daba soporte nutricional y 18,2% apoyo psicosocial. El 45,4% usaba la prueba de esfuerzo progresivo para pautar el entrenamiento. Existían 3 cicloergómetros (rango intercuartílico 2-5) y 1 tapiz rodante (0-2) por unidad. Todas las unidades contaba con médicos rehabilitadores y fisioterapeutas y en el 60% también participaban neumólogos. Conclusiones: No todos los hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid cuentan con unidades de RR. Además, el análisis de los indicadores de calidad asistencial en RR demuestran limitaciones en protocolos, evaluación del paciente, componentes y características de los programas, y aspectos administrativos y de investigación

Introduction: Although respiratory rehabilitation (RR) is considered as a therapeutic intervention with a high level of scientific evidence, the structure and organization of the RR units may have repercussions on its results. Our intention was to know the current situation of RR units in the Community of Madrid. Material and Methods: Analysis of results of the survey distributed to all hospitals in the Community of Madrid by email from the Sociedad Madrileña de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (NEUMOMADRID) and the Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación Cardiorrespiratoria (SORECAR). The survey was designed according to the standards of care quality in RR proposed by the Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR). Results: 11 (61.6%) hospitals reported that they had a RR unit. 54.5% of them did not have an access from primary care. 72.7% of the units indicated that referral of patients was not adequate. Almost all the units offered programs of physical therapy, aerobic training, muscular strength and educational support, however only 27.3% gave nutritional support and 18.2% psychosocial support. Progressive incremental test was used by 45.4% RR units. There were 3 cycle ergometers (interquartile range 2-5) and 1 treadmill (0-2) per unit. All units had rehabilitation physicians and physiotherapists, and 60% also had pulmonologists. Conclusions: Not all hospitals in the Community of Madrid have RR units. Moreover, the analysis of the indicators of care quality of the RR shows limitations in protocols, patient evaluation, components and characteristics of the programs, administrative and research aspects

A cross-sectional analysis of daytime versus nocturnal polysomnographic respiratory parameters in cystic fibrosis during early adolescence.

BACKGROUND: In Cystic Fibrosis (CF), early detection and treatment of respiratory disease is considered the standard for respiratory care. Overnight polysomnography (PSG) may help identify respiratory deterioration in young patients with CF. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 46 patients with CF, aged 8-12years, from a specialist clinic in a tertiary paediatric hospital. Daytime pulmonary function, shuttle test exercise testing and overnight PSG were studied. RESULTS: Of 81 children aged 8-12years, 46 (57%) agreed to participate. FEV1 (% predicted, mean 74.6%) was normal in 23 (50%), mildly abnormal in 12 (26.1%), moderately abnormal in 10 (21.7%) and severely abnormal in 1 (2.2%). Amongst sleep study parameters, FEV1 (% predicted) showed significant correlation with the respiratory rate (RR) in slow wave sleep (SWS), CO2 change in REM, baseline SaO2, and the arousal index (h-1). Backward, stepwise linear regression modelling for FEV1 (% predicted) included the entire group with a wide spectrum of clinical severity. From sleep, variables remaining in the multivariate model for FEV1 (F=16.81, p<0.001) were the RR in SWS (min-1) and the CO2 change in REM (p=0.003, and 0.014, respectively). When daytime tests were included, the variables remaining were RR in SWS and SD score for BMI (BMIsds) (F=18.70, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory abnormalities on overnight sleep studies included elevated respiratory rates during SWS and mild CO2 retention in REM sleep, and these incorporated into a model correlating with FEV1 (% predicted). Thus, mild mechanical impairment of ventilation is evident on overnight sleep studies in children with cystic fibrosis although the significance of this finding will require further investigation.

Sponsored multicentric clinical research conducted in Brazil in the respiratory area - losses and gains.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sponsored centers for clinical trial in the respiratory care setting in Brazil: profile; logistics and structure. METHODS: Principal investigators (29) and subinvestigators (30) of 39 research centers completed the questionnaires that addressed personal identification and training of researchers, the centers' facilities and advantages and/or disadvantages of performing sponsored trials. RESULTS: 75.6% of the centers were located in southern and southeastern Brazil. Most principal investigators were men with a mean age of 53.4 years. The clinical trials in the respiratory care setting focus on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonar disease (COPD). 80% of the researchers cited delay of the Conep and Anvisa as a barrier to performing research. The advantages of participating in clinical trials were updating knowledge of the researcher and the team, and additional income for the team. The main disadvantages mentioned by the researchers included low financial compensation for the performed workload, and time availability. The median number of professionals per research center was six people, predominantly physicians. CONCLUSION: The number of research centers in the respiratory care setting in Brazil is still relatively small. The teams have good training for performing the clinical trials. Asthma and COPD are the most studied diseases in sponsored clinical trials. The main barrier is delay by the Conep and Anvisa. The factors that lead investigators to participate range from being updated along with the team, to site and staff financial issues; the main disadvantage is the low compensation for the required workload demand.

Sponsored multicentric clinical research conducted in Brazil in the respiratory area - losses and gains / Pesquisas clínicas multicêntricas patrocinadas realizadas na área respiratória no Brasil - Perdas e ganhos

Summary Objective: To evaluate the sponsored centers for clinical trial in the respiratory care setting in Brazil: profile; logistics and structure. Methods: Principal investigators (29) and subinvestigators (30) of 39 research centers completed the questionnaires that addressed personal identification and training of researchers, the centers' facilities and advantages and/or disadvantages of performing sponsored trials. Results: 75.6% of the centers were located in southern and southeastern Brazil. Most principal investigators were men with a mean age of 53.4 years. The clinical trials in the respiratory care setting focus on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonar disease (COPD). 80% of the researchers cited delay of the Conep and Anvisa as a barrier to performing research. The advantages of participating in clinical trials were updating knowledge of the researcher and the team, and additional income for the team. The main disadvantages mentioned by the researchers included low financial compensation for the performed workload, and time availability. The median number of professionals per research center was six people, predominantly physicians. Conclusion: The number of research centers in the respiratory care setting in Brazil is still relatively small. The teams have good training for performing the clinical trials. Asthma and COPD are the most studied diseases in sponsored clinical trials. The main barrier is delay by the Conep and Anvisa. The factors that lead investigators to participate range from being updated along with the team, to site and staff financial issues; the main disadvantage is the low compensation for the required workload demand.

Resumo Objetivo: avaliar nos centros de pesquisas clínicas patrocinadas na área respiratória no Brasil o perfil, a logística e a estrutura. Método: questionários foram respondidos por pesquisadores principais (29) e subinvestigadores (30) de 39 centros de pesquisa relativos a identificação e formação dos pesquisadores, instalações dos centros e vantagens e desvantagens quanto à participação nas pesquisas patrocinadas. Resultados: setenta e cinco por cento (75,6%) dos centros se localizavam nas regiões Sul e Sudeste do Brasil. A maioria dos investigadores principais eram homens com média de idade de 53,4 anos. As pesquisas na área respiratória se concentravam no estudo da asma e da doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC). Oitenta por cento dos pesquisadores citaram a demora na Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (Conep) e na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) como fator de entrave para a realização das pesquisas. As vantagens em participar das pesquisas clínicas foram a atualização própria ou da equipe envolvida, com rendimento adicional para a equipe. A principal desvantagem apontada pelos pesquisadores foi a baixa compensação financeira em relação ao volume de trabalho e disponibilidade de tempo. A mediana de profissionais por centro de pesquisa foi de seis pessoas, com predominância de médicos. Conclusão: o número de centros na área respiratória no Brasil ainda é relativamente pequeno. As equipes apresentam boa formação para a realização das pesquisas. Asma e DPOC são as doenças mais estudadas pelas pesquisas clínicas patrocinadas. O principal entrave é a demora da Conep e da Anvisa. Os fatores que levam os investigadores a participarem variam desde atualização própria/equipe até questões financeiras para a equipe e o centro; a principal desvantagem relatada é a baixa remuneração diante da demanda de trabalho exigida.

Current care services provided for patients with COPD in the Eastern province in Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: COPD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The prevalence rate of COPD in the general Saudi population is estimated to be 2.4% and 14.2% among smokers. Not much is known about current health care services for patients with COPD in Saudi Arabia. The objective of this study was to determine the current care services for patients with COPD provided by government hospitals in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Directors of the Department of Internal Medicine from all 22 general government hospitals that are under the responsibility of the Ministry of Health or the Ministry of Higher Education in this region were asked to participate. Data were collected using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The study results indicated that there are limited hospital facilities for patients with COPD: no respiratory departments in any of the included hospitals, no spirometry in 77.3% of the hospitals, no intensive care units in 63.7% of the hospitals, and no pulmonary rehabilitation program in any of the hospitals. Among the included 22 hospitals, 24 respiratory physicians, 29 respiratory therapists, and three physiotherapists were involved in COPD care. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, current care services provided by government hospitals in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia for patients with COPD do not meet international recommendations for COPD management. Increased awareness, knowledge, and implementation of COPD guidelines by health care providers will most probably improve COPD management in Saudi Arabia. In addition, the government could improve dissemination of information about COPD management through national programs and by offering specific education regarding respiratory diseases.

[Dyspnoea in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) - a Survey in Spezialized German PH Centres]. / Dyspnoe bei Patienten mit Pulmonaler Hypertonie (PH) - Ergebnisse einer Befragung in deutschen PH-Zentren.

Dyspnoea is the predominant symptom in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) at diagnosis. However, since dyspnoea is nonspecific and often occurs in a number of common diseases, the presence of PH can easily be underdiagnosed.In addition, this symptom underlies a high variability in the subjective perception, therefore further diagnostic procedures are often delayed by the patients.A survey of the incidence and severity of dyspnoea in 372 patients with PAH was conducted by questionnaire in German centres. Age, sex distribution and the range of comorbidities corresponded to the findings of national and international registries.Approximately 99 % of patients reported the presence of dyspnoea on exertion, even at low loads.Remarkably, in 13 % of patients dyspnoea occurs as a paroxysmal symptom, which may lead to the differential diagnosis of bronchial asthma. In addition, the patients who were being followed in specialized PH centres reported an increase in dyspnoea during the last year.The results of the survey on the incidence of dyspnoea in patients with PAH are consistent with the findings of international studies.

An intermediate respiratory care unit for spinal cord-injured patients. A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) may need prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) and a long stay in the Intensive Care Unit. An intermediate respiratory care unit (IRCU) can shorten that stay, optimizing hospital resources. The aim of our work has been to evaluate the activity of such a unit in our hospital. METHODS: This is a descriptive retrospective study based on the data of patients with SCI and respiratory failure discharged from our IRCU between 1 July 2010 and 28 February 2013. RESULTS: We have analysed data from 146 patients with SCI, adding up to 228 admissions (68 first admissions and 160 readmissions due to complications or scheduled review visits). Sixty-three out of the 68 newly admitted patients survived their first admission (92.6%). Length of hospitalization was 195.6±110.4 days, 22 were admitted to monitor their respiratory status and 46 were on MV on admission. Of these, 26 (38.2%) were admitted to attempt weaning from the respirator and 20 (29.4%) to enter a programme of permanent respiratory support. Weaning was successful in 23 out of 26 patients (88.4%), the process taking 47.2±49.3 days. Forty of them (58.8%) were discharged to their home. CONCLUSIONS: An IRCU can manage a substantial number of severe SCI patients who need MV, and an important number of them can be weaned from the respirator. It may also achieve a good success rate in the integration of MV-dependent patients within family and society.

Patterns and factors associated with respiratory care protocol use.

BACKGROUND: Organizational factors associated with adoption and use of respiratory care protocols have received little attention. This study examines patterns of protocol use and features of a hospital and providers that are associated with respiratory care protocol use. METHODS: Forty-four hospitals and their health-care providers responded to an online survey regarding perceived outcomes of protocol use and their level of support for using protocols. Hospital features (ie, size, teaching status, and use of information systems) were also assessed. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 9 types of respiratory care protocols assessed (ie, asthma, COPD, ARDS, hypoxemia, pneumonia, noninvasive ventilation therapy, supplemental oxygen titration and discontinuation, ventilator weaning, and bronchopulmonary hygiene), the most commonly used were for oxygen titration and ventilator weaning. Large hospitals (> 350 beds) used protocols more widely than smaller hospitals (P = .01). Respondents felt that use of protocols enhanced cost and quality of care. Finally, hospital features that were associated with overall protocol use were stakeholder support for protocol use and use of high-quality hospital information systems. CONCLUSIONS: The study extends prior research by clarifying features of hospitals and providers associated with use of respiratory care protocols. Validation in future hypothesis-testing samples will further advance this knowledge.